compare
Stake vs Cloudbet: Head-to-Head Comparison (2026)
Stake vs Cloudbet compared on licensing, track record, games library, sportsbook depth, payouts, and who each site actually suits. Honest verdict with comparison table.
Stake (4.4/5) rates above Cloudbet (4.0/5) in our roster, reflecting its scale, public complaint track record, and broader product depth. Cloudbet holds a meaningful counterpoint: it is older (2013 vs Stake’s 2017), has survived multiple crypto market crashes intact, and has historically attracted serious BTC sports bettors with higher wagering limits. This is a genuine competition with no obvious winner for every player type.
This page contains affiliate links. Commissions we may earn have no effect on ratings or ranking order.
Licensing: What the Numbers Do Not Tell You
Neither site holds a Tier-1 licence. Both operate under Curaçao gaming authorisation, and that matters upfront: Curaçao does not offer the deposit protection, mandatory third-party auditing, or player-complaint escalation infrastructure that Malta Gaming Authority or UK Gambling Commission licences require. This caveat applies to nearly all crypto casinos — see our crypto casino licensing guide for a fuller breakdown.
What distinguishes these two is track record within that framework. Cloudbet has been operating continuously since 2013, making it one of the earliest Bitcoin-accepting gambling platforms anywhere. Thirteen years of active operation through multiple regulatory shifts, crypto bear markets, and industry consolidation is a concrete data point. Operators that survive that long typically do so by paying out, not by running exit schemes.
Stake launched in 2017 and has grown into one of the highest-traffic crypto casinos globally, with a very public profile (high-profile sports sponsorships, a high-volume community) and a correspondingly visible complaint record. That visibility cuts both ways — it makes unresolved issues harder to hide, which in practice improves accountability. Stake publishes its Curaçao licence on-site; verify current status before depositing.
Both have operated long enough that we can assess them on outcome, not just paperwork.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Criteria | Stake | Cloudbet |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Trust level | High | Medium |
| Licence | Curaçao | Curaçao |
| Founded | 2017 | 2013 |
| Operating history | ~9 years | ~13 years |
| Provably fair originals | Yes | Yes (casino originals) |
| Games library | Large (slots, live, originals) | Large (slots, live, originals) |
| Sportsbook | Yes — major + niche markets | Yes — strong BTC limits |
| Esports | Yes | Yes |
| Coin support | Major coins (BTC, ETH, etc.) | Major coins + broader altcoins |
| Fiat support | No | No |
| VIP / loyalty program | Yes (Stake Level system) | Yes (Cloudbet Loyalty) |
| Reported payout issues | Occasional (community-visible) | Minimal reports historically |
| Responsible gambling tools | Deposit limits, self-exclusion | Deposit limits, session tools |
Track Record: 2013 vs 2017
Cloudbet’s 2013 founding date is not merely trivia. The site launched before Bitcoin had meaningful mainstream recognition, before Curaçao became the default licence jurisdiction for crypto operators, and before most of the current crypto casino industry existed. It absorbed the 2018 bear market, the 2022 crash (which took several operators off the table entirely), and continued paying out throughout. That durability is a genuine signal of solvency.
Stake’s 2017 launch arrived at a different moment — crypto adoption was rising, the market for crypto casinos was more developed, and the path to rapid growth was clearer. Stake took that path aggressively, becoming the most visible crypto casino in the world by traffic and brand exposure. The trade-off is that high visibility amplifies complaints as well as compliments. Community forums and complaint aggregators show a higher absolute volume of Stake-related issues — this is partly a function of user volume, not necessarily a worse per-incident resolution rate.
Both are among the more credible operators in our roster. The trust difference — High vs Medium — reflects scale and community accountability at Stake, and longevity at Cloudbet, with the aggregate score landing in Stake’s favour.
Games Library
Both operators offer wide game libraries spanning slots, live casino, table games, and in-house originals.
Stake’s originals — Crash, Dice, Limbo, Plinko, Mines, and others — are among the most-played in the genre. All are provably fair, meaning outcomes can be independently verified using committed seeds. Stake’s originals have a notably polished interface and are frequently featured in community content, which has contributed to their mainstream visibility within crypto gambling circles. See our provably fair guide for how to audit these outcomes yourself.
Cloudbet’s casino originals are a smaller set but similarly provably fair. The site’s third-party game catalogue is large — a comparable depth of slots and live casino tables from major providers. The overall library breadth is comparable; the originals catalogue is where Stake has more depth and a higher-profile product.
If the originals experience is central to your choice, Stake is ahead. If you are primarily interested in sports betting alongside standard casino games, the libraries are effectively equivalent.
Sportsbook Depth
Both sites operate genuine, full-scale sportsbooks — not token add-ons.
Cloudbet’s sportsbook was built early and seriously. It was among the first platforms to offer meaningful Bitcoin betting limits in an era when most sportsbooks either did not accept crypto or capped BTC stakes at token levels. That heritage means Cloudbet has spent over a decade developing its sportsbook product, and players who need high BTC wager limits have historically found it one of the few places that accommodates that. Cloudbet also offers crypto trading pairs alongside sports markets, which suits a specific type of user.
Stake’s sportsbook is comparable in market variety, covering major sport leagues globally plus niche markets (esports, virtual sports, specials). Stake benefits from a larger active user base, which tends to improve live-market liquidity for in-play betting. Its interface is generally regarded as polished and well-integrated with the casino side of the product.
For casual or recreational sports bettors, both are adequate and the difference will be marginal. For players specifically looking to place large BTC wagers, Cloudbet’s longer-established limits are worth investigating directly with the operator before committing. Our best crypto sportsbook guide compares the field more broadly.
Payouts
Neither operator publishes independently audited withdrawal processing data. We cannot cite specific figures.
The community track record is stronger for both these operators than for many others in the crypto casino space. Cloudbet has a notably clean historical complaint profile relative to its age — for a site operating since 2013, the volume of publicly unresolved withdrawal complaints is low. This does not mean issues do not occur, but it suggests payout processes have been managed reasonably over time.
Stake’s complaint volume is higher in absolute terms but operates at far higher user volume. Withdrawal issues at Stake tend to cluster around identity verification requirements on larger withdrawals — standard KYC procedure, not operator-side obstruction.
Standard due diligence applies to both: read withdrawal terms before depositing, complete KYC early where possible, and distinguish network confirmation times (not the operator’s responsibility) from operator processing times. Our crypto withdrawal problems guide covers what to do if a withdrawal stalls.
Who Each Site Suits
Stake suits players who want:
- The most-visited crypto casino product, with a large, active community
- Polished originals with a proven play record (Crash, Dice, Mines, etc.)
- A full sportsbook integrated with casino, with good live-bet liquidity
- A visible, accountability-creating public profile
Cloudbet suits players who want:
- The longest-operating Bitcoin casino still in active service
- A sportsbook historically built for higher BTC wagering limits
- Slightly broader altcoin deposit variety
- A lower-profile product without Stake’s community-level visibility
Neither choice is wrong. For a full field comparison, our best crypto casino guide ranks all nine operators in our roster.
Responsible Gambling
Both sites carry real financial risk. Every game has a house edge that compounds over time — no strategy, system, or provably fair mechanic eliminates this. Our house edge guide explains how this works in practice for the game types on both sites.
Both Stake and Cloudbet offer deposit limits and self-exclusion. Cloudbet also offers some session-level tools. Neither holds MGA or UKGC licences, so neither is legally required to provide the full responsible gambling suite mandated by Tier-1 regulators.
You must be 18 or older to use either site. Online gambling is legal only where explicitly permitted by your country of residence. Verify your local law before creating an account at either operator.
Bottom Line
Stake (4.4) leads our roster over Cloudbet (4.0), and that gap reflects real differences in scale, community visibility, and originals depth. Cloudbet’s answer is 13 years of continuous operation, a sportsbook product built with serious BTC bettors in mind, and a historically clean withdrawal reputation relative to its size.
If you are a general crypto casino player who also wants a sportsbook, Stake is the more complete and visible product. If you are specifically a high-stakes BTC sports bettor, or if seniority and demonstrated durability matter more to you than brand visibility, Cloudbet deserves a closer look. Neither is a bad choice within the crypto-casino risk category — but that category carries less regulatory protection than a licensed fiat casino, and that baseline applies to both.
FAQ
- Is Stake or Cloudbet safer to use?
- Both operate under Curaçao licensing — not a Tier-1 regulatory body. Stake (4.4) scores higher in our roster on the strength of its scale, complaint visibility, and multi-year track record since 2017. Cloudbet (4.0) has the longer operating history (2013) and has maintained solvency and payouts through multiple crypto market cycles, which counts in its favour. Neither is regulated at a level equivalent to MGA or UKGC. Verify current licence status on each operator's site before depositing.
- Which has the better sportsbook: Stake or Cloudbet?
- Both carry genuine, broad sportsbooks covering major and minor sports. Cloudbet has historically offered higher Bitcoin betting limits and was among the first sportsbooks to accept BTC seriously (2013). Stake's sportsbook is comparable in depth and benefits from the site's higher traffic and larger community, which feeds live-market liquidity. High-stakes BTC bettors have historically pointed to Cloudbet; general bettors typically find Stake's interface and market variety sufficient.
- Can players from Japan use Stake or Cloudbet?
- Both sites geo-block certain jurisdictions. Using online casinos from within Japan is illegal under Japanese gambling law. Legality depends entirely on your country of residence — verify your local law before registering at either site. This is not legal advice.